Mattia Nannelli vs Miha Vetrih Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 01 Sep at 02:29 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Nannelli vs M. Vetrih

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

SLO
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Nannelli 1 - 0 Vetrih
They have played 2 sets in total, with Mattia Nannelli winning 2 and Miha Vetrih winning 0. The last match between Mattia Nannelli and Miha Vetrih was at the M15 Bologna, 01-09-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Clay, with Mattia Nannelli getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-2.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Nannelli | 1 |
Vetrih | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) M15 Bologna(09-01-25)
M. Nannelli vs M. Vetrih H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
58.97% (23-16) | Career Total W/L | 50.85% (90-87) |
1 | Clay | 0 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Nannelli vs M. Vetrih Match Preview:
- Recent second serve performance indicates Vetrih has a slight advantage, winning 44.05% of points compared to Nannelli's 41.56%.
- When it comes to returning, Nannelli has the edge, securing 47.4% of second-serve return points, while Vetrih captures 44.35%. For first-serve returns, Nannelli leads with 31.13%, versus Vetrih's 27.95%.
- Facing breakpoints, Nannelli shows resilience by saving 59.14%, whereas Vetrih saves 45.19%. Which player handles pressure better? Nannelli.
- Performance over the last year favors Nannelli, winning 56.25% of matches, against Vetrih's 50% win rate.
- On preferred surfaces, Vetrih excels on clay with a 52% success rate, while Nannelli performs best on hard courts, with a 60% winning percentage. Which surface favors them in this matchup?
- Both players frequently compete at Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K level, with Nannelli achieving a slightly higher win percentage of 56.25%, compared to Vetrih's 50%.
- Opponent quality shows Vetrih faces slightly tougher competition with opponents averaging a rank of 131.08, against Nannelli's opponents ranked at 180.22.
- In deciding sets, both players have a balanced record, each winning 56% of those scenarios in the past year.
- Conversions of breakpoints give a minor advantage to Vetrih, successfully converting 31.58% of chances, while Nannelli manages a 28.07% conversion rate.
Editorial Prediction (September 1, 2025, UTC):
When examining recent performances, Vetrih holds a narrow edge in second serve points won, suggesting slightly better service stability. However, in return games, Nannelli shows stronger aggression by outperforming Vetrih on both first and second serves.
Pressure situations in matches reveal Nannelli's upper hand, saving more breakpoints, which is crucial in tight match scenarios. While Vetrih perhaps faces more seasoned opponents, Nannelli's overall win rate is slightly superior.
Both players exhibit similar stamina in deciding sets, but Vetrih's slightly higher breakpoint conversion rate might give him an edge in critical moments. Their preferred surfaces may not play a significant role unless the match surface aligns with their strengths.
Weighing these factors, Nannelli's resilience under pressure and stronger return statistics suggest he is more poised to claim victory in their next encounter.
Mattia Nannelli vs Miha Vetrih Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Nannelli vs M. Vetrih H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
13 | Games Won | 8 |
0 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
2 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
2:20:51 | Average Match Time | 2:20:51 |
74% (53/72) | 1st Serve % | 57% (50/87) |
66% (35/53) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (34/50) |
74% (14/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (15/37) |
38% (3/8) | Break Pts Won % | 13% (1/8) |
44% (38/87) | Return Points Win % | 32% (23/72) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Nannelli Recent Matches Played
M. Vetrih Recent Matches Played

M. Nannelli vs M. Vetrih Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
58.97% (23/16) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.85% (90/87) |
57.47% (50/37) | Sets Win/Loss | 49.75% (198/200) |
54.18% (460/389) | Games Win/Loss | 49.91% (1889/1896) |
60.00% (6/4) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.00% (2/2) |
58.62% (17/12) | Clay Win/Loss | 51.46% (88/83) |
0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
12 | Aces Total | 149 |
0.06 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
26 | Total Double Faults | 180 |
1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
187.56 | Average Opponent Rank | 184.73 |
72% (651/909) | 1st Serve % | 60% (3425/5691) |
63% (408/651) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (2137/3425) |
50% (129/258) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (1042/2266) |
39% (44/112) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (247/594) |
43% (394/910) | Return Points Win % | 42% (2297/5489) |
58.97% (23/16) | Futures W/L | 50.85% (90/87) |
58% (22/38) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (89/176) |
57% (4/7) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 43% (13/30) |
50% (5/10) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (26/45) |
84% (25/21) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (84/74) |
16% (25/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (84/10) |
14% (14/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (93/15) |